2026 Big 12 Football Preseason Position Rankings | Where We Agree — And Where We Don’t

The Big 12 has become one of the nation’s deepest conferences when it comes to defensive back play. Veteran safeties, lockdown corners and transfer portal additions have reshaped several secondaries heading into the 2026 season, but not everyone sees the conference the same way.

Using a 16-point voting system—16 points for a first-place vote, 15 for second place and so on down to one point for 16th—we combined the ballots from Caleb, Matt and Zack to create a consensus ranking of every defensive back unit in the Big 12.

Before diving into the consensus rankings, here’s a look at each writer’s individual ballot and their reasoning for the top three and bottom two teams.


Caleb

1. Texas Tech | The Red Raiders return one of the nation’s premier cornerbacks in Brice Pollock, while their experienced safety group gives Texas Tech perhaps the conference’s most complete secondary.

2. BYU | Evan Johnson and Faletau Satuala headline one of the Big 12’s most experienced defensive backfields, combining elite ball skills with veteran leadership.

3. TCU | Jamel Johnson leads a talented and athletic secondary that possesses the upside to finish with the conference’s best pass defense.

4. Kansas State

5. Arizona State

6. Baylor

7. Utah

8. Arizona

9. Iowa State

10. Houston

11. Cincinnati

12. Colorado

13. UCF

14. Oklahoma State

15. West Virginia | The Mountaineers are rebuilding after losing several experienced contributors and will rely heavily on unproven talent.

16. Kansas | The Jayhawks lack proven production and depth, leaving major questions entering the season.

Matt

1. BYU | The Cougars boast perhaps the nation’s best safety tandem in Evan Johnson and Faletau Satuala, giving them unmatched cohesion on the back end.

2. Texas Tech | Brice Pollock anchors one of the conference’s most aggressive secondaries, allowing defensive coordinator Shiel Wood to dial up pressure.

3. TCU | Veterans Jamel Johnson and Bud Clark headline one of the Big 12’s most experienced defensive back groups.

4. Houston

5. Arizona State

6. Arizona

7. Utah

8. Kansas State

9. Oklahoma State

10. Baylor

11. UCF

12. Kansas

13. West Virginia

14. Cincinnati

15. Colorado | The Buffaloes have talent at cornerback, but concerns remain about safety depth and overall structure.

16. Iowa State | Massive roster turnover and a coaching change leave the Cyclones facing a complete rebuild.

Zack

1. BYU | The Cougars return two preseason All-Big 12 selections in Evan Johnson and Faletau Satuala, giving them the conference’s deepest secondary.

2. Texas Tech | Brice Pollock and Brenden Jordan bring elite experience to one of the Big 12’s most battle-tested defensive backfields.

3. TCU | TCU returns key contributors and added experienced transfers to dramatically improve last season’s pass defense.

4. Colorado

5. Arizona State

6. Arizona

7. Houston

8. Kansas State

9. Cincinnati

10. UCF

11. Utah

12. Baylor

13. Oklahoma State

14. Iowa State

15. West Virginia | The Mountaineers are expected to start multiple transfers and a true freshman in a secondary that struggled in 2025.

16. Kansas | Limited returning production leaves the Jayhawks with major questions entering the season.

Consensus Rankings

RankTeamCalebMattZackPoints
1BYU21147
2Texas Tech12246
3TCU33342
4Arizona State55536
5Kansas State48831
5Arizona86631
7Houston104730
8Utah771126
9Baylor6101223
10Colorado1215420
11Cincinnati1114917
11UCF13111017
13Oklahoma State1491315
14Iowa State9161412
15West Virginia1513158
16Kansas1612167

Biggest Agreements

The Clear Top Four

All three voters agreed on the conference’s elite tier.

  • BYU: 2nd, 1st, 1st
  • Texas Tech: 1st, 2nd, 2nd
  • TCU: Unanimous No. 3
  • Arizona State: Unanimous No. 5

The top of the conference appears remarkably settled entering the season.

Complete Agreement

No team generated more consensus than:

  • TCU: Ranked third on all three ballots.
  • Arizona State: Ranked fifth on all three ballots.
  • West Virginia: Finished between 13th and 15th.
  • Kansas: Ranked either 12th or 16th.

Biggest Disagreements

Colorado (11-spot difference)

  • Caleb: 12th
  • Matt: 15th
  • Zack: 4th

No team generated more disagreement. Zack believes Colorado’s transfer additions will immediately transform the secondary, while Caleb and Matt remain skeptical.


Iowa State (7-spot difference)

  • Caleb: 9th
  • Matt: 16th
  • Zack: 14th

Matt and Zack view Iowa State’s coaching change and roster overhaul as too significant to overcome, while Caleb is much more optimistic.


Baylor (6-spot difference)

  • Caleb: 6th
  • Matt: 10th
  • Zack: 12th

Caleb sees a potential breakout secondary, while Matt and Zack believe there are still too many unanswered questions.


Houston (6-spot difference)

  • Caleb: 10th
  • Matt: 4th
  • Zack: 7th

Matt is considerably higher on Houston’s veteran talent and believes the Cougars are one of the conference’s most underrated secondaries.


Kansas (4-spot difference)

  • Caleb: 16th
  • Matt: 12th
  • Zack: 16th

Matt believes the Jayhawks’ returning experience gives them a higher floor than the other guys do.


Overall Thoughts

The three ballots reveal four distinct tiers entering the 2026 season.

Tier One: Championship-Caliber

BYU, Texas Tech and TCU have clearly separated themselves from the rest of the conference. All three programs boast elite safety play, veteran leadership and proven production.

Tier Two: Serious Challengers

Arizona State, Kansas State, Houston and Arizona form the conference’s next tier. Each possesses enough talent to climb into the top three with a strong season.

Tier Three: The Wild Cards

Baylor, Colorado, Utah, Cincinnati and UCF generated significant disagreement among the panel. These teams could realistically finish anywhere from the middle of the conference to the bottom half.

Tier Four: Rebuilding Projects

Oklahoma State, West Virginia, Iowa State and Kansas enter the season facing major questions about depth, experience or roster turnover.

Final Takeaway

The biggest storyline isn’t the tie at the top between BYU and Texas Tech—it’s the unanimous belief that TCU belongs in the elite tier as well.

The real debate begins in the middle of the conference, where teams like Colorado, Baylor and Houston generated wildly different evaluations.

If these rankings tell us anything, it’s that the Big 12’s defensive back race remains wide open behind the consensus top three. By November, the middle tier could look dramatically different than it does entering fall camp.

Leave a Reply